
How AI Is Changing M&A: Insights from Axial Dealmakers
Artificial intelligence has steadily evolved from buzzword to business tool, and is now being meaningfully integrated across M&A workflows throughout…
Advisors, Business Owners, Buyers
For the fourth year running, Axial partnered with Firmex and Divestopedia on the annual M&A Fee Guide, the authoritative source on M&A fees for sell-side engagements in the middle market.
Using data gathered from a survey of mid-market dealmakers—including more than 150 Axial members—the guide highlights key points of interest regarding M&A fees across geographies and deal sizes.
Axial’s exit consultants introduce you to the right M&A advisor to help you secure the best terms for your business sale. With more than 14 years of unparalleled access to the small business M&A landscape, we have the largest network of pre-vetted M&A advisors and the right resources to guide you through every step of your exit journey.
Below are select survey results showing year-over-year comparisons of advisors’ fee structures across retainers and success fees. See the end of this feature to download the ebook and access the full guide.
Engagement fees—paid upfront or throughout the transaction process—play an essential role in how M&A advisors manage risk, allocate resources, and ensure client commitment. Most advisors kept fee structures unchanged in 2024, but modest increases are expected in 2025.
–
When asked how these advisors determine the structure and pricing of their engagement fees, most pointed to a common theme: managing the risk that comes with being a smaller firm reliant on the uncertainty of success-based compensation.
Generally, firms earn the majority of their revenue from success fees tied to the value of a closed deal. The most common structure, used by 44% of surveyed firms in 2024, is the Lehman formula, where fees decline as deal size increases.
Alternatively, the accelerator formula, where fees increase with larger deal sizes, is gaining traction—20% of firms used it in 2024, up from 16% in 2023. Flat-fee structures, where a single percentage applies regardless of deal size, were used by 26%, down from 31%.
“I try to remain competitive in the market while pricing in a manner that rewards my firm for the value provided. I also price and select projects to maintain a fair work-life balance. We are not looking to grind ourselves to the bone.”
– Greg Desimone, Catapult Advisory Group
“The Lehman Formula is a model that we’ve been comfortable with. When we’ve attempted to move to other structures, we get more pushback on fees.”
– Michael Vann, The Vann Group
“We keep our fee structure straightforward—we only charge a standard fee upon the successful completion of a transaction. This ensures our firm remains fully aligned with our clients’ interests and accountable for delivering results. The only exception to this structure would be for clients requiring extensive business consulting services beyond exit negotiation and closing support.”
– Joe Bieshelt, Venture North Group